EPICEL Data

Clinical Experience

A study by Andrew Munster, M.D., of the Baltimore Regional Burn Center of the Johns Hopkins University compared the outcomes of therapy in patients with massive burns with or without cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs). There was found to be a significant reduction in mortality in the CEA group compared with controls, from 48% to 14% (p<.007).1 Excerpts from the study follow.

From Munster AM. Cultured skin for massive burns: a prospective, controlled trial. Ann Surg 1996.

This published article reported on an independent, physician-sponsored study that compared the outcome of therapy in patients with massive burns with or without cultured epidermal autografts. Two groups of patients were studied over a seven year period. One group received standard care (excision plus allografting and/or split thickness autografting) and the other group received standard care plus EPICEL. All patients for entry into the study had to satisfy the following criteria: 1. a minimum burn size of 50% with a substantial third-degree component, and 2. survival beyond the first operative procedure for excision and initial coverage. Genzyme Biosurgery was able to collect data from the medical records of 44 of the patients in this study. A summary of this data is shown in Table 1.2

Table 1 Available Data from Munster Study

 

 EPICELCONTROL
Number of Patients (n) 20 24
Sex    
Male n (%) 15 (75.0) 22 (91.7)
Female n (%) 5 (25.0) 2 (8.3)
Mean 3rd Degree Burn (%) 41.4 ± 20.92 38 ± 25.37
Risk Factors  
Mean Age (yrs) 29.6 ± 13 44.0 ± 18.5

Mean Total Body Surface Area
(TBSA) (%)

69.1 ± 15.03 62.9 ± 13.16
Inhalation Injury n (%) 18 (90.0) 19 (79.2)
Final Status at 7 years    
Survival n (%) 18 (90.0) 9 (37.5)
Death n (%) 2 (10.0) 15 (62.5)

 

References

  1. Munster AM. Cultured skin for massive burns: a prospective, controlled trial. Ann Surg 1996; 224:372–5.
  2. EPICEL Directions for Use; Page 8.
Contact Customer Care